Strategic management Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words - 19

Strategic management - Essay Example People of Stockholm are relatively proactive when they are charged to pay fees for using the roads because of their awareness over increasing degree of emissions. The same cannot be said to be true for the people of Delhi. A topic becomes interesting when it is on a burning issue of interest to all stakeholders. Increasing degree of emissions in the air has reached threatening levels from the increasing vehicular traffic and emissions of gases, harmful for all human beings. When a comparison is made between such cities, which are not parallel in the matter of advancement, the topic becomes more interesting and relevant. Although Delhi is the capital city of India and one of the leading developed cities in the matter of infrastructure development, yet its comparison with Stockholm, the capital as well as the largest city of Sweden, is inclined to show gaps in transport policies, adopted by these two cities’ governments. The major theme of this topic, as acknowledged by the authors, is that more than planning and functioning of the sophistication in transport means, the politics of sustainable transport plays a decisive role on the urban planning of these two cities and to highlight the differenc es of major transport functions and operations in these two cities, although similarities also exist in both cities’ urban development projects. The introduction includes two tables at the outset. Both the tables analyse the data of the two cities on the parameters of population, area, population density, household size and gross per capita income. One thing that comes to sharp notice is the time period of the data that begins from the year 2003 although the article print year is 2010. When it comes to statistical comparison of data, in my view, data should not be older than five years for the writing of such articles. One gets a blurred view when Delhi is

Carrier Liability Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Carrier Liability - Essay Example It is, however, necessary to refer to the Hague-Visby Rules (hereinafter referred to as HVR) and case law in order to investigate the carrier's liability. The HVR function to clarify the duties owed to, and responsibilities owed by, cargo liners, providing a comprehensive explication of the circumstances and types of damages to cargo which carriers are not liable for as well as those that they may be held liable for. Further, and as established by CoGSA (1971) and by national courts, HVR is applicable when either party to the dispute is a member of a Contracting State.1 With these points in mind, the issues to be investigated are, firstly, whether HVR is applicable in this instance and, secondly, in case of applicability, whether the carrier is liable for the damages to the rice. As determined by English law, and as further emphasised through CoGSA, HVR is enforceable upon carriers travelling from any port in Great Britain and Northern Ireland to any port within it.2 More relevant, however, is the fact that it is enforceable upon carriers that are travelling from a port or to any port which is party to HVR.3 The implication here is the HVR is enforceable as both the USA and Netherlands are parties to HVR. Within the context of the stated, it is important to note that Articles III, 1c and III, 2 of HVR establish the carrier as responsible for ensuring that its holds and chambers are well-suited for the storage of cargo, including their preservation and protection.4 These articles further emphasise that the carrier, including its personnel, are obligated to exercise all due caution to safely store and protect the goods.5 Furthermore, as stipulated in Article II, not only is the carrier responsible for the safe storage of the cargo but it is further liable for any damages which may befall the goods through loading and stowing.6 The above mentioned articles are immediately relevant to the question of the carrier's liability towards the damages which the rates may have wreaked upon the bagged rice. In brief, they establish liability as a direct outcome of the failure of the crew to exercise due care regarding the protection of the cargo from damages. The carrier's liability is established by HVR. HVR, Article IV, 2b states that the carrier is not liable for damages to cargo by "fire, unless caused by the actual fault or privity of the carrier." 7 This liability directly arises from Article IV, 1's assertion that the carrier and its personnel are obligated to exercise all "due diligence" to ensure that the ship is seaworthy and its crew fit.8 The crew did not exercise the requisite due diligence, as is evident from the failure to report the sighting of the rates and, the vessel was not seaworthy, a fact which takes on additional importance when considering liability for delay in delivery. Case law supports the argument pertaining to the carrier's liability, as in the matter of Papera Traders Co Ltd & Ors V (1) Hyundai Merchant Marine Co Ltd (2) Keihin Co Ltd Sub Nom Eurasian Dream (2002)9 In this case, the cargo owners sued the carrier following the occurrence of a fire which destroyed the cargo and rendered the vessel a total loss. As the owners of the